You make some valid points, thanks for your feedback. Two things come to mind on this for me. First, you'll see on the lab analysis that there is an amazing amount of CBDA on the lab results, which goes back to my original point of why all the emphasis on 1 hemp cannabinoid (CBD) when hemp has CBDA and many others. Could it be that CBDA for example may be a more beneficial cannabinoid? With further investigation, possibly this could be determined. But again, CBD is the only point of reference being provided to people re:hemp so that seems to be a very narrow focus. Also, if you look at the hemp sourced CBD sold all I have seen is colorless, odorless etc but hemp of course is green...so that is how it is ending up by the time it is sold to the public, having been transformed from its natural state and decarboxylated it into something different. So, does that necessarily give you a product that is better for you? I'd be interested in hearing what people think on that, and I am of course not qualified to give a definitive answer. One could say it's more 'potent' as a result but couldn't you also say it is a much less 'natural' product at that point? It would seem producing CBD in the way I described or doing so in the commercially common way both have different advantages and drawbacks, and it would be interesting to see which way folks would prefer if given the chance to have it one way or the other.
Above all I think it is exciting for more thought to be given to cannabinoids other than CBD with regard to hemp, since that area seems ripe for further investigation. Looking forward to hearing more comments!